Submit a request to compare options. Return JSON {"question":"...","options":"...","criteria":"...","format":"..."}. question - what we choose and for whom; options - 2-4 specific options; criteria — 3-6 comparison criteria (using the same standards for everyone); format - answer form; necessarily a comparative table (or pros/cons) and a final conclusion “which option is suitable for whom”.
Mechanics: if you simply list the options, the model will describe each in its own style - and it will be impossible to compare them, because the measurements are different. Comparison only appears when you specify a common set of criteria and require it to be applied equally to each option. Levers. Unified criteria: 3-6 parameters, the same for everyone. Table format: rows - options, columns - criteria; so you can see the gaps. Conclusion requirement: “at the end, tell who what suits” - otherwise you will get a description without a solution. Insider technique: ask not only “for”, but also “against” each option, and the same number of points. People and models tend to praise - symmetrical pros and cons reveal weak points that would otherwise be silent. Second trick: add an “unfair” criterion - hidden costs that the seller does not advertise (commissions, renewal terms). This separates advertising from reality. A common mistake: asking “which is better?” no criteria. The model will choose at random or avoid. A good comparison always starts with measurements.
Unlock access to submit solutions for instant AI review.